MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERS FOR THE FAR-LEFT DSA

moderate Democrat President John F. Kennedy

My book, “Proud to be American”, is on sale, on-line, for $17.95 from Amazon and also can be ordered from any bookstore. It contains 70 articles in nine categories and has 70 pictures. The book analyzes national, international and domestic problems and also critiques main- stream media and the far-left of the Democrat Party. It also has a provocative introduction and conclusion.

Without the Main Stream Media (MSM) the Democrat Party would be doing much better than it is as well as the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). How? Why? That’s what this post is all about.

For whatever reason, the Mainstream Media protects the far left of the Democrat Party. It does this by 1)not reporting on those unpopular things that Democrat politicians may say or do, by 2)misreporting a story or facts to cover for a Democrat politician or to demonize a Republican politician, and by 3)creating false stories

If MSM did the job it is supposed to do, it would force our politicians to be much more honest than they are because the media would expose them.  For example, President Trump and the Republican Party are much stronger today because of the constant criticism from the media.  The Democrat Party and its DSA does not receive serious criticism from the media and is consequently much weaker.  Now, of course, the Party is paying the price as the truth about past cover-ups by the media become clear…one of the biggest is the fake Trump-Russia collusion as documented in the previously-classified annex to the Durham Report.

Democrats cannot win national elections with their far-left policies because those policies are unpopular with most Americans, including most Democrats. I’m talking about “men in women’s sports.” sex-change surgeries on children,” “open borders,” etc.  If the Media simply did its job well, Democrat politicians would know how bad their far-left policies are and would hopefully rethink their political positions on those issues.

So what should the Democrat Party do now? Find a moderate Democrat leader, such as the governor of Maryland, Wes Moore, former Chicago mayor, Rahm Emanuel, or Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro.. moderate Democrat politicians who can win elections.  The Party can’t win with the crazies at the helm in their Party, with the possible exception of New York City. If the media really wants their Democrat allies to win, they need to start being honest in their reporting.

HOW TO RECOGNIZE FAKE NEWS

My book, “Proud to be American,” is on sale now at Amazon and also can be ordered at any bookstore for $17.95.  It’s a 330-page paperback book with 70 articles in nine categories and with 70 pictures.  It analyzes national, international, and domestic problems and critiques Main Stream media and the far left of the Democrat  Party. it also has a provocative introduction and conclusion.   #        #          #         #

How do you know if news i.s fake?  This question was especially important in following the Kyle Rittenhouse trial where the mainstream news media as well as CNN and MSNBC were atrocious in continuously misstating the facts.  I know this because I watched some of the trial and heard the facts.  What’s to be done? Over the years I originated the following:

First, you need to consider the source of the news and ask yourself, “how does the journalist know what s/he is telling us?”  Many sources are simply someone’s conjecture being stated as fact.  If journalists were completely honest, they would begin many of their opinion pieces with something like, “I believe,” or “I think,” rather than stating what they think as fact.

Second, you need to look at access.  Most of the time you hear journalists, with no special access to the President, report on what the President is thinking.  Once again, you need to ask yourself, ” how did they get their information?”  It usually is speculation stated as fact or some anonymous unreliable source.

Third, you need to look at the track record of the journalist for reporting factually.  After observing a potential source of information for accuracy, I decide whether to continue to use that source, because it’s very time-consuming to double and triple-check every fact (so I need to know who I can believe).  Fox News’ Brit Hume, Shannon Bream and Laura Ingraham are three of the many sources I trust. Mainstream media, such as ABC, CBS, and NBC simply could not be trusted for reporting accurate information about anything involving President Trump.  Cable channels CNN and MSNBC are even worse to the extent that they are simply left-wing propaganda channels.  OAN (One America News) was mostly straight reporting of the news and reported about four times more news that any other TV channel, but of course it has been taken off the air.

Fourth, I avoid journalists who also are not truthful.  Being partisan is O.K. as long as the reporting is accurate and truthful.  For example, MSNBC’s Rachel Madow is very partisan and is not truthful, while Fox News’s partisan Sean Hannity is truthful, so I can trust Hannity but not Madow for accurate information.

Fifth, there are many other sources, including bloggers and radio talk-show hosts, who are great sources of solid information.  Radio talk-show host, Rush Limbaugh, now deceased, immediately comes to mind as someone who was a reliable source of accurate information.  Washington Examiner’s investigative journalist and chief correspondent, Byron York, is a great source.

Sixth, the very best source is the original, real, actual source of information, the kind you see on CSPAN-1, 2, or 3, not most journalists or reporters.  Subject-matter experts, like Gordon Chang and Michael Pillsbury, are great sources for information on China.  The best source for what President Trump said is President Trump himself.

Seventh, Mark Levin’s book, Unfreedom of the Press, Bernard Goldberg’s books, Bias and Arrogance, and Bob Kohn’s book, Journalistic Fraud, are but a few of the books that document how biased the news media is.  Everyone should be extremely careful taking anything from the mainstream media as factual and accurate.  The very best source to check on what sources are accurate is the Media Research Center (MRC). Most “Factcheckers” are worthless, or even worse, misleading.

CONCLUSION

Critical thinking is essential to determining whether a piece of news is real or fake.  If you are extremely partisan or are emotionally engaged for either side, looking at the news objectively is very difficult, but is possible if you really want to know the truth.  You need to take shortcuts for determining fake vs. real news because thoroughly going through an analysis each time you hear a news story takes too much time that most people do not have.  My shortcuts are essentially watching and listening to credible, accurate and truthful sources.  With Kyle Rittenhouse I watched some of his trial and concluded that it was clearly a matter of self-defense, though it was imprudent of Kyle to go to the Black Lives Matter riot.  On the other hand, if you simply watched the reporting of the trial instead of the trial itself, you probably think that Rittenhouse was guilty.

Finally, be cautious in quickly accepting as fact anything you hear, read, or even see.  If it sounds crazy, it probably is.  The media has an agenda and usually doesn’t even report those things that don’t fit into its agenda (censorship by omission).  It is disheartening to see but it’s today’s reality.  Eternal vigilance in scrutinizing the media is necessary to keep it honest at simply reporting the news rather than fabricating or twisting it; our decisions are based on the facts we believe to be true; therefore, it’s very important to determine which news is real and which is fake.

 

UNDERSTANDING TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME (TDS)

My book, “Proud to be American, ” is on sale at Amazon and Barnes and Noble for $16.95. It’s a 300-page paperback book containing 68 articles in nine categories making analyses of important national, domestic, and international issues. In addition, it critiques the Media and the far-left of the Democrat Party.

#     #     #      #

What exactly is Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) and why does it matter?  Loosely defined, it’s an intense hatred of President Trump to the extent that it makes someone very emotionally unhinged and completely lose control of their temper…and for a few people…leads them to violence; consequently, its important to examine how people develop TDS…

I believe it all begins with presidential candidates’ likeability. A study looked at Presidential elections over a 100-year period, comparing likeability and whether the most likeable became President. In all but two cases, the most likeable candidate was elected President.  President Trump, although he has a good heart, in the 2016 and 2020 elections, spoke very assertively or even aggressively at times and also sometimes was not articulate enough for some people to understand everything he was talking about. This enabled the biased and incompetent Main Stream Media to create their interpretation of what he meant.

People can catch TDS by repeatedly being exposed to the demonization of President Trump by the news media and Democrat leaders and seeing President Trump accused of all kinds of evil ulterior motives.

Since it all begins and ends with the Media, perhaps the continual successes of President Trump and the embarrassment of the MSM will eventually soften their biased approach.  If the Media would present Trump’s achievements as well as what it dislikes, this would help. Let’s hope so because America really needs a great Press to keep everyone honest, but currently it’s totally dishonest and therefore cannot be trusted to accurately report on anything.