WHAT QUALIFIES ZOHRAN MAMDANI TO BE THE NEXT NYC MAYOR?

My book, “Proud to be American,” is on sale at Amazon and also can be ordered from most bookstores for $16.95. It’s a 300-page paperback containing 68 articles in nine categories with 70 pictures. The book analyzes national, international, and domestic problems and also critiques the Propaganda Media and the Far-left of the  Democrat Party.   #    #    #    #

“Each generation must   learn anew” because when they don’t know the past, they are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. If this were not true, candidate Zohran Mamdani’s polls would be in the toilet because the history of Socialism demonstrates that it always makes everything worse for everyone.  Mamdani calls himself a Democratic Socialist rather than simply a Socialist, which is what he is (there’s nothing “democratic” about a socialist). Other than for political purposes, it doesn’t matter what you call it.  To get a good look at Socialism, check out my article on this blog entitled, “Is Capitalism Ethical? Does Socialism Work?”

The policies Mamdani has pursued as a member of the NYC Council and as a candidate for mayor are disastrous. However, the Mamdani campaign focused on the unaffordability of living in New York City but offered unworkable Socialist solutions. Mamdani is young and good-looking and offers the appealing promise of everything being free. If you saw the mayoral debates, especially the final one, perhaps you changed you mind about voting for Mamdani.  The other mayoral candidates, Cuomo and Sliwa took him to the woodshed but how many people even watched it because they already made up their minds.

Given the above, will Zohran Mamdani be elected mayor? The last poll showed he had a 47% approval with Andrew Cuomo at a distant 30% and Curtis Sliwa 16%.  It looks like he will and  because the present generations were not taught history.  Experience is a harsh teacher but some don’t learn any other way.

Finally, what qualifies Mamdani to be the mayor of a large metropolitan city?  Nothing!

UNDERSTANDING SEXUAL HARASSMENT

What do  governor Andrew Cuomo, mogul Harvey Weinstein, former Senator Al Frankin,  and Jeffrey Epstein, all have in common?  All have been accused of sexual harassment!  From hearing victims’ sexual harassment stories, I believe it’s very important to first clearly define exactly what sexual harassment is.  Having done Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) counseling collateral-duty (part-time), while working full-time as a program analyst with a bureau in  the U.S. Department of the Interior, I’m familiar with the clear definition of sexual harassment by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, at 29 C.F.R. 1604.11, as follows:

Sexual Harassment is conduct in the form of “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature” when such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostlite, or offensive working environment.” 

Except for its legal implications, it’s not important to someone who feels harassed, frightened, or intimidated, whether s/he has been technically and legally sexually harassed. The following very relevant quote is taken from an article by Mortimer Zuckerman that appeared in the May 23, 1994, issue of US News and World Report:

“That sexual harassment exists is unquestionable, but that many acts of sexual misconduct are overdramatized is also true.  To avoid trivializing those who suffer the real thing, we must reject the idea that any unwanted advance or remark constitutes harassment.  There is a difference between an unwanted encounter, which may upset a woman, and pressure applied — such as threatening a woman’s job security — or ongoing demeaning treatment.  Those wrongly accused have their own ordreal in trying to prove a negative.”

When I was working for a U.S. Department of the Interior bureau in Denver, I also belonged to a public speaking club where someone accused me of “inappropriate behavior.”  Moreover, even before hearing my rebuttal, the club voted me out, whereupon I hired a lawyer to help me get my “due process” rights that were listed in the club’s charter.  In working through the details of the case, my accuser could not cite any examples of what I did that was inappropriate.  I sought advice from many people on how to handle the incident.  The psychiatrist I consulted advised that, since the woman had recently gone through a horrible divorce,  she was taking out her anger on me.  I also read many books on communication problems between the sexes, including the excellent, You Just Don’t Understand, by Deborah Tannen in order to make sense of why she accused me.

CONCLUSION

Both men and women need to learn how to deal with sexual harassment.  Men need to understand that women can destroy their lives and therefore they need to be more considerate of women’s feelings and perceptions and educate themselves on how and when many women become uncomfortable with some of their actions, such as using foul language, coming on too strong, and being too aggressive.  One of man’s basic evolutionary roles was to protect women; it’s wrong to harass them.

Women need to educate themselves on sexual harassment and how to handle various situations in a manner that eliminates the problem with a minimum of anguish.

Finally, for those trying to judge what the truth is in a potential sexual harassment encounter, remember to not completely believe anyone because of his/her gender; just listen to all sides and follow the evidence.