Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

IF YOU’RE NOT A LIBERAL AT 20…; IF YOU’RE NOT A CONSERVATIVE AT 40…

WW II British Prime Minister Winston Churchill said “if you’re not a Liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you’re not a Conservative at 40, you have no brain.”  What exactly did Churchill mean and is it valid? That’s what this brief post is about.

At 20 years old, people are usually idealistic and usually believe what their mentors (teachers, professors) inculcate into them.  However, the parents of teachers and professors in most of today’s universities and colleges became Liberal in the 1960’s when draft dodgers fled there to avoid the Draft and Vietnam.  Consequently, students today hear only one side of  national issues, and further, are discouraged to even listen to both sides, because the other side is characterized as being racist or sexist or whatever.

At 40 years old, people are usually much more mature, often with a spouse and children, and begin devoting much more time following public issues.  Moreover, they have lived long enough to become much better at recognizing  the lies and deceit engaged in by many politicians.  And because many at age 40 now have children, National issues take on much greater importance with the realization that many Liberal/Progressive policies not only don’t work, but actually do great harm to the people that they supposedly are intended to help.

I’m 50% Conservative and 50% Liberal.  That does not mean 50% Republican and 50% Democrat.  What’s Liberal or Conservative about $19 trillion in National Debt?  What’s Liberal or Conservative about health care that is a confusing, disorganized, and unaffordable the way Obamacare is configured?  What’s Liberal or Conservative about a weak military or a foreign policy that punishes our allies and rewards our enemies?

At 74, I’m in the last part of my life, and I’d love to leave this world knowing that the U.S. will be OK, but I’m not there yet,however most young people scare me because they can vote, though they know less than nothing about the issues…less than nothing because much/most of what they think they know is misinformation.  I don’t mean to sound critical, because it’s natural for the young to spend their time pursuing mates, getting an education and starting a career.  However, on November 8, 2016, President Trump turned around the economy, after coming close in a Obama-led race to the trash heap of history.  Whether  the Trump economy continues to play out might depend on how the young vote, the young being the group whose future would be the most devastated by another Democrat President-controlled big-government statist president.

A famous British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, said it best:  “The problem with socialism is that, sooner or later, you run out of other people’s money.”  The U.S. got very close to running out of being financially able to borrow more of other people’s money.  I believe that President Trump has stopped this from happening.

 

All Services

HILLARY CLINTON vs. DONALD TRUMP

The Clinton and the Trump campaigns are close to an end after being hard-fought.  Currently, Clinton is doing better in the media-run polls than Trump, though Trump is doing better than Hillary in the most accurate-in-the-past polls, and his rallies are getting larger than his usual large crowds.  Note that one of the recent WikiLeaks “John Podesto” emails told the media how to rig polls to make it appear that Hillary was trouncing Donald (this was done to achieve a “bandwagon effect”).

Multi-billionaires, like Donald Trump, obviously don’t get to be wealthy by being stupid.  However, Trump is prone to rhetorical excesses. He is the populist anti-establishment candidate, called by his son, Eric, a “blue-collar billionaire”.

Hillary Clinton has an interesting hand because she was President Obama’s Secretary of State, however she has developed into a good debater and speaker.  As the WikiLeaks “Podesto” emails have exposed, as well as many more credible sources, Hillary Clinton will do almost anything, no matter how corrupt or illegal, to win the election and become President of the United States.  Moreover, the FBI has re-opened the investigation of her having classified information on her private computer server.

On policy, Trump has the advantage because Obama’s policies have hurt medical care, foreign policy, the military, the economy, Israel, etc., and Hillary, as Obama’s Secretary of State, is closely allied with Obama’s policies.  On the other hand, if you only watch NBC, ABC, or CBS, you have’nt heard about these negatives about Obama (so Obama’s shortcomings don’t really matter that much).

There are many reasons for electing “your” candidate, but here is the strongest reason for supporting either Clinton or Trump.

o for Clinton: if you like Obama’s presidency, you’ll like Hillary; however, you’ll have to overlook rampant corruption in a Clinton Administration (past performance is the best indicator of future behavior).  Hillary Clinton should be better than Obama was as commander-and-chief of the military.

o for Trump: he would appoint at least 3 conservative Supreme Court justices, his economic plan would double the size of the economy (Gross Domestic Product or GDP) within 10 years after his policies are put  into effect (which is what happened under President Reagan), he would fix illegal immigration, and he would repeal and replace Obamacare.

I’m a political junkie because much of my education and interests were about government and my jobs were with the Federal, a State and a city government, where elected political leaders were in charge.  I know both sides of every issue and therefore know who is fabricating and twisting facts to support their policies.  For the sake of everyone on the planet, I pray we make the right decision in selecting our next president.

 

ISRAEL, OBAMA & IRAN

Talk around town is that Israel is going to bomb Iran’s underground nuclear facilities this summer.  Henry Kissinger has said that if Iran gets the bomb it will use it.  The United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)  has reported that Iran is getting very close to getting the bomb.   Given all of these facts, as well as the fact that Israel’s very survival is at stake, it seems likely that Israel will strike.

Of course, if the Unites States, with its formidable military arsenal, helps Israel, there would be a greater likelihood that significant damage would be done to Iran’s nuclear facilities to set it back perhaps 3 years.

As bad as this scenario is, if sanctions don’t deter Iran, whose leader (Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) promised to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, it’s obviously a better option than allowing the lunatic fringe (Iran’s leaders) to get the bomb.  So the big question is,  will President Obama allow the U.S. to assist Israel or will Israel have to go it alone.  He has said that he “has Israel’s back,” but was he sincere is saying this?

This is important not only because of the increased likelihood of success if the U.S. helps Israel, but also because Israel’s actions would initiate a much greater worldwide political firestorm if it bombs Iran’s nuclear facilities without U.S. participation.  The United Nations would go bonkers.   Arab countries would threaten retaliation, even though most of them would be secretly relieved that the Region’s Crazy (Iran) was de-fanged.

U.S. involvement depends on the President.  Obama must be mindful of his diminished popularity among America’s Jewish population because he has become much nicer to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.  However, the President’s childhood includes time being raised as a Muslim.  Like all Muslims, he must have been taught to hate Israel and all Jewish people.  So given his politics versus his early training, what would he do?  We’ll soon find out.  Let’s hope he makes the right decision and that the “Great Satan” (radical Islam’s name for the U.S.) helps the  “Little Satan” (radical Islam’s name for Israel) in destroying Iran’s underground nuclear facilities so that not only Israel, but the entire world, would be much safer.

The upcoming presidential election will play a major role in what the President does.  He’s already done a minor betrayal of Israel by naming the country that Israel would use as a staging area for an attack on Iran. ..this to discourage Israel from bombing Iran before the election.  The far-left would strongly disapprove of the U.S. helping Israel but would it vote for Mitt Romney or simply not vote?  Personally, I think that this might be Obama’s only chance for re-election…assisting or even taking the lead, using its nuclear-tipped bunker-buster bombs in destroying all entrances and exits to Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. Some of the underground facilities are as deep as a thousand feet, which is even beyond the range of the bunker-busters, but destroying  their access would do the job.  National defense hawks would love it and this, combined with Obama’s liberal use of drones, would convince some of them that Obama should be re-elected.  Or it could be a political wash, both losing and gaining similar amounts of votes (the political calculation I believe is most  important to the President this year).

I believe the President should just do the right thing for Israel, the United States and the world: destroy Iran’s  underground nuclear facilities.  Once Iran gets the bomb, it will be too late and Israel might be annihilated.

Recent Posts